Saturday, May 28, 2022

The 3 Most Racist and Disruptive Ideologies of Human Life in the World

 If you voice anti-racism, anti-discrimination, anti-apartheid, and all kinds of ideas about “glorifying one’s own ego”, as well as “degrading” other human beings. So be thorough, fight all forms of racism, anti-Asian, anti-Black, anti-Islam, anti-Jewish, anti-non-Aryan, etc. Because IF ONLY fight one type of racism, but close your eyes and ears to other types of racism. So there will never be a harmonization of the unity of all mankind in the world. Because actually people like that also have a racist mentality in their brains and hearts.

Following the review of the BBC version and Tirto Humanism, there are three of the most racist ideologies that destroy human life. Is there one of them that is stored in the chambers of our hearts?

Human ‘Animal’ Zoo

Colonialism is very vulnerable to bring bitter stories to the colonized. As Belgium did in 1958, the advanced and prosperous countries in Western Europe were not in tune with the spirit of their leaders, they added to the dark history of colonialism. Instead of humanizing humans, but actually “animalizing” humans. They made a show entitled Human Zoo.



Reporting from the guardian, the Belgian government created an exhibition that was designed like a zoo , but the contents were a group of living humans . Surrounded by a fence made of bamboo, the men, women and children of black coolies from the Congo were exhibited like a zoo displaying animals.

Amina The Queen

 Is a Muslim Woman Military Strategist from Africa, the Queen of Africa who Loves Her People. This tough female figure who is touted as the Queen Mother of Africa is a 16th century Muslim female knight from Nigeria.

A statue stands in honor of Amina Sukhera in front of the National Theater of the Arts in Lagos, Nigeria. Describing the struggle of a hero, and being an example for his nation. She is the Muslim Queen of Fighters from the Dark Continent



She ruled for 34 years in the tribal region of Zazzau (now northern Nigeria) and became the first woman to rule there.

The sweet taste of sugar creates deep bitterness for others

 If someone says that sugar comes from Cuba, then the answer is wrong. Have you ever read western scientists honestly say that, “We owe a lot to the East”. Or “We must admit that the knowledge of many Muslims is the basis for the progress of western civilization”. Or “Our country is currently becoming rich and prosperous is actually starting from spices and “white gold” from the East”. As sad and miserable as being colonized, there is still a little painkiller, because there is still the voice of honest scientists. This is the scientific work of honest western scientists. Want to reveal the greed and colonialism that was once done by the ancestors of the western nation.



Alexander the Great’s military expeditionary delegation was astonished to discover a type of sweet-tasting reed along the landmass around the Indus River in 327 BC. The reeds they call “bee-free honey producers.” Now we know it as cane sugar (Saccharum officinarum L). Although the plant is native to Southeast Asia, sugarcane was not really cultivated and chemically processed until 800 BC in India. The discovery of sugar in India by the armies of Alexander the Great is thought to have been the first contact of sugar with the Western world, but sugar did not reach the Blue Continent until centuries later. Sugar first spread to various regions such as China, Persia and especially the Islamic territories in the Middle East.

Be careful and selective when it comes to “scientific science”

We recognize that scientists from any nation, from any race, from any scientific discipline, and from any religion, have contributed greatly to the progress of human civilization. But there are also many scientists who turn out to use their knowledge for negative purposes. Especially to achieve personal and group ambitions. And in the end it will give birth to mental superiority and racism towards other parties.

So keep being critical, careful and selective when you get “scientific knowledge”. Even though the person who delivered was an academic with a series of titles attached to his name. Including the “heavenly knowledge” that we get from religious leaders, regarding religion the guidelines are simple that, “there is no God who teaches racism to humans, there has never been a prophet who set an example for being racist, and there is nothing written in the holy book of any religion that educating his people to be racist. There is only WRONG IN INTERPRETING the teachings of his religion, or deliberately distorting and playing with the teachings of his own religion.”